Peran Politik terhadap Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum

  • Septriyan Anugrah Universitas negeri Padang
  • Nizwardi Jalinus Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rijal Abdullah Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Mudjiran Mudjiran Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Diah Anggraini Austin Universitas Andalas
  • Rayendra Rayendra Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract

Efforts to improve the quality of education continue to be carried out by the government, one form of this effort is the development and review of the curriculum so that it is under the times. Several factors underlie curriculum development, including philosophical, psychological, socio-cultural, political, state development and world development, and science and technology (IPTEK) foundations. The process of changing the curriculum in various countries cannot be adapted to the political conditions in that country, therefore the educational curriculum may change at any time according to the political conditions that affect the country concerned. This study aims to analyze and describe the influence of politics on curriculum development in the National Education System. This research is qualitative research using a literature study approach. Furthermore, data were collected through document study.

References

Connelly, M., Fang He, M., & Phillion, J. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction. SAGE Publications.Inc.
Davis, K. (1990). Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Fadlilah Wening Dwi Hastuti, N., & Sutama, M. P. (n.d.). Politik dan Sistem Pendidikan Nasional: Pengaruh Politik terhadap Implementasi Kurikulum di Indonesia. In Doctoral Dissertation. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Hidayat, S. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hunkins, F. P., & Ornstein, A. C. (1989). (1989). Curriculum Innovation and Implementation. Education and Urban Society. Education and Urban Society, 22(1), 105–114.
Joseph, S. (2015). Curriculum Politics in Higher Education: What Educators Need to do to Survive. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 14–20.
Lundeberg, M. ., & Levin, B. . (2003). Prompting the Development of Preservice Teachers “Beliefs Through Cases, Action Research, Problem-Based Learning, and Technology”, in JRaths and A McAninch (eds), Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Performance: The Impact of Teacher Education. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich CT, 23–42.
Made, P. (2011). Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Marsh, C. J., & Wills, G. (1995). Curriculum: Alternative Approaches, on Going Issues. Prentice Hall.
Muhaimin. (2009). Pengembangan Model Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) pada Sekolah dan Madrasah. Rajawali Press.
Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nkyabonaki, J. (2013). The Space of Politics in Tanzania`s Curriculum. Scholarly Journal of Scientific Research and Essay (SJSRE), 2(7), 109–117.
Spindler, G. D. (1987). Educational and Cultural Process, Anthropological Approaches. Waveland Press, Inc.
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Published
2021-11-30
How to Cite
Anugrah, S., Jalinus, N., Abdullah, R., Mudjiran, M., Austin, D., & Rayendra, R. (2021). Peran Politik terhadap Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(2), 139-143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v21i2.1135