Pengembangan Student Worksheet Model MORE Berbasis Teori Konstruktivistik Sosial Vygotsky di MAN 1 Pontianak

Sutoyo Budiharto; Ismet Basuki

doi:10.24036/pedagogi.v21i2.1071

Sutoyo Budiharto MAN 1 Pontianak
Ismet Basuki Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v21i2.1071

Abstract

This study aims to develop student worksheets of good quality and effectiveness to improve students' knowledge competencies. The student worksheet developed refers to the MORE (Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain) learning model based on Vygotsky's social constructivist theory. This development research refers to the steps developed by Thiagarajan, namely the 4-D model. Data collection techniques in this study applied interviews, observation, and tests. The analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative. The empirical test of increasing knowledge competence uses the pre-experimental method with one group pretest-posttest design. Data on knowledge competency improvement were analyzed using the paired sample t-test. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPS 1 at Moslem Senior High School (MAN). The results of this study are as follows: first, the MORE student worksheet model based on Vygotsky's social constructivist theory has a very good quality. Second, the MORE student worksheet model based on Vygotsky's social constructivist theory is effective for history learning.

References

Billingsley, G. M., Thomas, C.N., & Webber, J. A. (2018). Effects of student choice of instructional method on the learning outcomes of students with comorbid learning and emotional/behavioral disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1–4.
Brooks, S., Dobbins, K., Scott, J. A. A., Rawlinson. M., & N. (2014). Learning about learning outcomes: the student perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 721–733. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2014.901964.
Carillo, L., Chis. L., & D. R. (2015). Enhancing science teaching by doing. The Science Teacher, 60–64.
Caspersen, J., Frolich, N., Karlsen, H., & Aamodt, P. O. (2014). Learning outcomes across disciplines and professions: measurement and interpretation. Quality in Higher Education, 20(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/Doi:10.1080/13538322.2014.904587
Caspersen, J., Smeby, J. C., & Aamodt, P. O. (2017). Measuring learning outcomes. European Journal of Education, 52, 20–30. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12205
Christ, W. G. (2004). Assessment, media literacy standards, and higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1177/0002764204267254
Culsum, N. T. U., Helsy, I. F., & I. (2013). Kemampuan siswa menghubungkan tiga level representasi melalui model MORE (Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain)’. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains 2013 (SNIPS 2013), 159–163.
Gagne, R. M. (1977). The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kosasih, E. (2014). Strategi belajar dan pembelajaran implementasi kurikulum 2013. Yrama Widya.
Landrum, T. J., & Landrum, K. M. (2016). Learning styles, learning preferences, and student choice: Implications for teaching. Advances in Learning & Behavioral Disabilities, 29, 135–152. https://doi.org/Doi:10.1108/S0735-004X20160000029006
Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). ‘Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond ‘educational bulimia’?’. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.
Masui, C., Broeckmans, J., Doumen, S. (2012). Do diligent students perform better? Complex relations between student and course characteristics, study time, and academic performance in higher education’. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 1–23.
Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan No. 8 tentang buku yang digunakan oleh satuan pendidikan. (2016). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan No. 8 tentang buku yang digunakan oleh satuan pendidikan. Kemendikbud.
Ramadhany, A., Purnomo, A., & Suryadi, A. (2016). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran project based learning pada pembelajaran sejarah terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas XI IPS MAN Temanggung. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 4(2), 14–20.
Ramos, P. H., & Susan, D. L. P. (2009). Learning history in middle school by designing multimedia in a project-based learning experience’e. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782545
Ransom, M., & Manning, M. (2013). Teaching strategies: worksheets, worksheets, worksheets. Childhood Education, 89(3), 188–190. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2013.792707
Rubin, L. (2016). Six word memoirs: a content analysis of first year course learning outcomes. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(3), 395–403.
Thiagarajan, Semmel. D. S., and Semmel, M. I. (1974). ‘Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children a sourcebook.’ Indiana University.
Tien, L. T., Teichert, M. A., & Rickey, D. (2007). Effectiveness of a MORE laboratory module in prompting students to revise their molecular-level ideas about solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 175–181.
Utami, W. S., Sumarmi, Ruja, I. Y., & Utaya, S. (2016). The effectiveness of geography student worksheet to develop learning experiences for high school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 315–121. https://doi.org/Doi:10.5539/jel.v5n3p315
Wardayanti, R., Suharsono. R., & R. (2017). Pengembangan model pembelajaran sejarawan kecil berbasis sejarah lokal situs keraton sasunanan Surakarta pada sub bahasan zaman kerajaan Islam di Indonesia kelas X MAN 1 Surakarta tahun 2016/2017. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 5(1), 47–54.